Disability and Representation

Changing the Cultural Conversation

Scapegoating Schizophrenia: Paul Steinberg’s Shameful New York Times Op-Ed Column

The scapegoating continues.

This week’s New York Times Op-Ed page features an utterly irresponsible article in which psychiatrist Paul Steinberg baselessly blames schizophrenia for mass shootings. In a truly chilling fashion, Dr. Steinberg argues that, in order to prevent such tragedies, we need to stop worrying our heads about the civil rights of people with schizophrenia:

[W]e have too much concern about privacy, labeling and stereotyping, about the civil liberties of people who have horrifically distorted thinking. In our concern for the rights of people with mental illness, we have come to neglect the rights of ordinary Americans to be safe from the fear of being shot — at home and at schools, in movie theaters, houses of worship and shopping malls.

Dr. Steinberg makes a pejorative and unsubstantiated association here between schizophrenia and the mass shootings that have taken place in 2012. He refers to shootings “at home and at schools” (a clear reference to the December 14 Newtown, Connecticut massacre), “in movie theaters” (a clear reference to the July 20 Aurora, Colorado theater shooting), “houses of worship” (a clear reference to the August 5 shooting at a Sikh Temple in Oak Creek, Wisconsin), and “shopping malls” (a clear reference to the December 11 shooting at a shopping mall in Portland, Oregon).

Terrifying events, to be sure. But before we start tossing people’s civil liberties out the window, let’s look at whether any of the perpetrators of these violent acts actually had schizophrenia:

As far as we know, Adam Lanza, the Newtown shooter, was not diagnosed with schizophrenia, nor have we heard evidence that he was delusional.

James Holmes, the shooter in Aurora, saw a psychiatrist who specializes in schizophrenia — which means precisely nothing regarding his own diagnosis. Her practice was not limited to people with schizophrenia. He has not been diagnosed with the condition.

Wade Michael Page, who murdered six people at a Sikh Temple, was a racist skinhead who no one has ever remotely hinted showed signs of schizophrenia.

Jacob Tyler Roberts, who was responsible for the shooting at the mall in Portland showed no signs of delusional thinking to anyone around him, including his girlfriend.

But that doesn’t stop Dr. Steinberg from coming up with two new culprits:

At Virginia Tech, where Seung-Hui Cho killed 32 people in a rampage shooting in 2007, professors knew something was terribly wrong, but he was not hospitalized for long enough to get well. The parents and community-college classmates of  Jared L. Loughner, who killed 6 people and shot and injured 13 others (including a member of Congress) in 2011, did not know where to turn.

Of course, Seung-Hui Cho was never diagnosed with schizophrenia in his lifetime. Psychiatrists like Dr. Steinberg have only done so post-mortem, and the more responsible ones acknowledge that they cannot make such a diagnosis with any certainty. The only mass murderer to whom Dr. Steinberg makes reference who has actually been diagnosed with schizophrenia is Jared Lee Loughner.

There are very good reasons that psychiatrists have to meet a client in person in order to render a diagnosis: second- and third-hand testimony is notoriously unreliable, and diagnostic assessments can take days to complete. Oddly enough, Dr. Steinberg seems to be aware that he is breaking the ethical standards of his profession by diagnosing people he has neither met nor treated:

I write this despite the so-called Goldwater Rule, an ethical standard the American Psychiatric Association adopted in the 1970s that directs psychiatrists not to comment on someone’s mental state if they have not examined him and gotten permission to discuss his case. It has had a chilling effect. After mass murders, our airwaves are filled with unfounded speculations about video games, our culture of hedonism and our loss of religious faith, while psychiatrists, the ones who know the most about severe mental illness, are largely marginalized.

As far as I can see, the only “unfounded speculations” here are coming from Dr. Steinberg. It is hard to imagine how an affluent psychiatrist in private practice could imagine himself to be “marginalized,” particularly when it comes to armchair diagnoses. Given that his entire piece further marginalizes an entire group of people who already far more likely to be the victims of violent crime than to be the perpetrators, the term rings especially hollow.

To his credit, Dr. Steinberg does acknowledge schizophrenia is not generally associated with violence, though he then turns around and contradicts himself:

The vast majority of people with schizophrenia, treated or untreated, are not violent, though they are more likely than others to commit violent crimes.

Dr. Steinberg rather skews the evidence here. In fact, people with schizophrenia are not more likely to commit violent crime when one factors in the presence of substance abuse. A PLoS study found that, when controlling for the presence of drug and alcohol abuse, people with psychosis are no more likely to commit violent crime that people without psychosis:

Importantly the authors found that risk estimates of violence in people with substance abuse but no psychosis were similar to those in people with substance abuse and psychosis and higher than those in people with psychosis alone. (Gulati et al. 2009)

In other words, people with no psychosis who abuse alcohol and drugs have a higher risk of committing a violent crime than people with psychosis who do not abuse alcohol and drugs, and a similar risk to people with psychosis who do. The factor to be looking at is drug and alcohol abuse, not schizophrenia.

That point seems to have been lost on Dr. Steinberg. He should know better. Shame on him.

References

ABC News. “Clackamas Town Center Shooting: Who Is the Alleged Shooter?” http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/video/clackamas-town-center-shooting-jacob-roberts-alleged-shooter-17959547. December 13, 2012. Accessed December 27, 2012.

The Atlantic. “Diagnosing Adam Lanza.” http://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2012/12/diagnosing-adam-lanza/266322/#. December 13, 2012. Accessed December 27, 2012.

Billeaud, Jacques. “Trial not likely for Jared Lee Loughner in 2012.” Boston.com, January 6, 2012. Accessed December 27, 2012. http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2012/01/06/trial_not_likely_for_jared_lee_loughner_in_2012/.

Gulati, Gautam, Louise Linsell, John R. Geddes, and Martin Grann. “Schizophrenia and Violence: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” PLoS Med 6, no. 8 (2009). doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000120.

Laris, Michael, Jerry Markon, and William Branigin. “Wade Michael Page, Sikh temple shooter, identified as skinhead band leader.” The Washington Post, August 6, 2012. Accessed December 27, 2012. http://articles.washingtonpost.com/2012-08-06/world/35491487_1_end-apathy-sikh-temple-skinhead-band.

PBS News Hour. “Alleged Colorado Shooter Saw Schizophrenia Expert.” http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/social_issues/july-dec12/colorado_07-27.html. July 27, 2012. Accessed December 27, 2012.

Psychiatric News Alert. “People With Schizophrenia More Likely to Be Victims, Not Perpetrators of Violence.” http://alert.psychiatricnews.org/2012/05/people-with-schizophrenia-more-likely.html. May 10, 2012. Accessed December 27, 2012.

Steinberg, Paul. “Our Failed Approach to Schizophrenia.” The New York Times, December 25, 2012. Accessed December 27, 2012. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/26/opinion/our-failed-approach-to-schizophrenia.html?_r=0.

Welner, Michael. “Cho Likely Schizophrenic, Evidence Suggests.” ABC News, April 17, 2007. Accessed December 27, 2012. http://abcnews.go.com/Health/VATec h/cho-schizophrenic-evidence-suggests/story?id=3050483#.UNxJWnfLBQF.

© 2012 by Rachel Cohen-Rottenberg

Share

    12 comments already | Leave your own comment

  1. 12/27/2012 | 11:28 am Permalink

    Thank you, as always, for your post. I read Dr. Steinburg’s article yesterday and it made me feel rather frozen inside. Shame as well on the NY Times for continuing to print alarmist responses without offering additional context.

    Respond to this comment

  2. 12/27/2012 | 11:44 am Permalink

    “I write this despite the so-called Goldwater Rule, an ethical standard the American Psychiatric Association adopted in the 1970s that directs psychiatrists not to comment on someone’s mental state if they have not examined him and gotten permission to discuss his case. It has had a chilling effect. After mass murders, our airwaves are filled with unfounded speculations about video games, our culture of hedonism and our loss of religious faith, while psychiatrists, the ones who know the most about severe mental illness, are largely marginalized. ”

    Paul, please stay behind after class and write 50 times “Two wrongs don’t make a right.”

    Respond to this comment

  3. 12/27/2012 | 12:02 pm Permalink

    The New York Times very seriously needs to stop printing misinformation about psychiatric and neurological conditions on its Op-Ed page. I count this piece in the same family with the baseless trivialization of Asperger’s Syndrome perpetrated by two pieces there a while ago (only this one is far more dangerous, calling for pre-emptive institutionalization rather than simple disregard). When “expert” opinions on neurological and mental health conditions don’t meet the standards necessary to be printed in the HEALTH section, that should be a signal, New York Times, that perhaps this isn’t worth printing.

    It’s true that schizophrenia is a terrible disease which we treat badly, but the resulting detriment is much greater to the people with schizophrenia than it is danger to “ordinary” Americans, who according to Dr. Steinberg are clearly the only ones with rights worth protecting.

    Respond to this comment

  4. 12/28/2012 | 4:44 pm Permalink

    Thanks to a Facebook friend for sharing this and thanks so much Rachel for writing it. I started to write a reply and then it became longer than the original post. Sigh… The reply is at http://ask-an-aspie.net/response-to-dr-paul-steinbergs-nyt-op-ed/

    Respond to this comment

  5. 12/29/2012 | 3:19 pm Permalink

    Rachel, I just wanted to add my thanks to you for writing this.

    Many of us older autistics carry a misdiagnosis (depression, schizophrenia, bi-polar.) Many people with a schizophrenia diagnosis will learn that their diagnosis will change with a new doctor. I’m concerned that the diagnostic manuals are just rubbish, after all. I understand that getting services is often dependent on the label/diagnosis. But other than that — it is all just nonsense rubbish.

    I agree that persons with a diagnosis of schizophrenia receive more harm from others (and not the other way around.)

    Respond to this comment

  6. 12/31/2012 | 1:06 pm Permalink

    If there is a crisis with mental health in this country then I have no doubt the fault clearly lies with these so-called professionals who don’t know squat about the fields they so-call claim to have studied. So far I know of two “professionals” who have gone on CNN speaking for Autism and Asperger’s and are pretty much telling either lies or are clearly clueless as to knowing anything about it.

    The NYTimes and CNN have lost so much credibility as a result of their reporting of Sandy Hook that they’re not likely to earn good favor again as credible news sources for a very long time. At least not by me.

    Respond to this comment

  7. 1/1/2013 | 9:45 am Permalink

    Great post. Thanks for being such a clear voice against all the ignorance surrounding the role of mental illness in these shootings.

    Respond to this comment

  8. Trackbacks & Pingbacks

  9. Uneducated NYTIMES contributers can kiss my @$$ | ambiguouslyethnicgirl

    [...] excellent rebuttal of some of his points is here (on a site that you should bookmark and read regularly, if you don’t already).  In his [...]

  10. Response to Dr. Paul Steinberg’s NYT Op-Ed | Ask An Aspie

    [...] Cohen-Rottenberg over at the disabilityandrepresentation.com blog wrote a post Scapegoating Schizophrenia: Paul Steinberg’s Shameful New York Times Op-Ed Column today.  Dr. Steinberg’s commments are an example of why I felt compelled to create the Ask [...]

  11. The Disinformation Continues | Michael Forbes Wilcox

    [...] friend Rachel Cohen-Rottenberg has written a clear, academic-style response (complete with references that support the facts she cites). In it, she decries not only his [...]

  12. Who Is Mentally Ill? «

    [...] Scapegoating Schizophrenia: Paul Steinberg’s Shameful New York Times Op-Ed Column [...]

  13. Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    *



    You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>